By Gift Osaze
Aware that any further action on Walter Kanu Onnoghen, the suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria , CJN, may incure the wrath of the United Nations, UN, Human Rights Commission, President Muhammadu Buhari, may have hands off from further probing into the matter because of the bad image it is giving to his government internationally.
At present, the government has enough evidence of alleged misconduct against the suspended CJN, going by the reports of the Nigerian Financial Intelligence Unit, NFIU ,and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, that should warrant the removal of the Cross river state born suspended CJN, from office but Buhari appear to have shifted the matter to the National Judicial Council, NJC, to decide on.
Diego Garcia Sayan, the UN Special Raapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers may have given an insight of what would happen to Nigeria if the government did not retrace its step on the Onnoghen matter when he criticised the decision to suspend the former CJN, describing it as ”threats, pressures and interferences” made against the lawyers defending him.
Given an in sighton what should facilitate the suspension or removal of a Juge ,Sayan cited the UN Human Rights Standard which provide that Judges could only be dismissed from office on ”serious grounds of misconduct or incompetence”, an indication that the Nigerian government had not exhausted any of these considerations before applying the sledge hammer on the suspended CJN.
The Katsina born Nigerian President and the cabal in the Presidency who are all out to see the back of Onnoghen as the CJN, may have read the hand writing on the wall that there is trouble ahead when he said ”any decision to suspend or remove a Judge from office should be fair and should be taken by an independent Authority , such as Judicial Council or Court.
He alluded to the President’s claim that he had acted in Compliance ” with an Order issued by a Tribunal to decide on alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct of public officials. He noted that if the President had justified his action based on the recommendation of a Tribunal, but there have four other Courts with higher jurisdiction which had ordered that proceedings on the matter be halted but was ignored . This is an indication that the action may have been pre-meditated to remove him ahead of the Presidential election due to be held next Saturday.
His suspension may have provided an opportunity for Ibrahim Tanko Mohammed , acting CJN, to oversee the petitions that arise from the conduct of the general elections. Many believe that Buhari and the cabal in the Presidency may have feared that with Onnoghen at the Head of the nation’s Judiciary, it would be difficult for aggrieved APC Candidates to have their way in Court. The last Wednesday arrest of one the alleged Senior Advocates of Nigeria, SAN, defending him in Court speaks volume. According to him the continued ”threats, pressures and interference on the work of Judges constitute ”grave attacks to the Independence of the Judiciary and free exercise of the legl profession”.
According to him, ” lawyers should be threatened or sanctioned for action taken in accordance with recognised professional duties , standards and ethics”, insisting they play an essential role in securing access to Justice and should never suffer.
The intervention of the UNHRC, on the matter may have forced the NJC to set up a preliminary complaints assessment committee to probe the responses tendered by Onnoghen and Mohammed , the acting CJN, to the petions against the duo. Soji Oye, Director of Information, NJC, confirmed that that the members met last Monday to consider the petitions against the duo.
Note that the duo had earlier been given seven days to respond to the allegations against them. Oye also disclosed that the Council had received another petition from theIbrahim Magu led Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, against Onnoghen, which was said to have been forwarded to him for response within seven working days.
Recall that the EFCC had initiated
Going by the findings of the Commission , which informed the petition to the Council, the ”inflows into all the accounts of the suspended CJN between 2012 and 2016, cannot be justified by his monthly salary of about N751,082.37 or a yearly salary of about N9,012,988.44.
Tanti-graft agency was said to have claimed in its petition to the NJC, that suspended CJN USD account in Standard Chartered Bank Plc had turnover of $922,657. 00 between October and September 2016., through several structured deposits by different individuals. The GBP account of the erstwhile CJN, in the bank , according to the Commission had a turnover of N138,439.00 between 2012 and 2016, made up of mostly transfers and deposits to the account by him.
Also, the agency was said to have claimed in the petition that the embattled CJN, has investments in Life Friend Plc , Agricole , Lloyds TSB and Pur Noble. His investments in Life Friends Plc and relation with Agric Cole Redemption Pro and other identified Companies was said to resulted into the payment of $121,116 and $482,966 respectively into his domiciliary account in Standard Chartered Bank.The agency was said to have further claimed in the petition that the suspended CJN has a Current account turnover of N44,462,000.00 between 2012 and 2016 made up of mostly transfers and deposits from 2011 and 2013. The EFCC , in their petition to the NJC, further revealed that he paid N41 million to adhoc committee on sales of government houses Abuja to acquire of one the properties ear marked for sale .
The suspended CJN had reportedly told those that care to listen that all the monies found in his account are his legitimate earnings and oversea medical allowances in the last 50 years on the bench. It could not be ascertained whether he had submitted his response to the EFCC petition but Oye the NJC Image maker said the Council would meet on Wednesday, February 13, 2019, under the interim Chairmanship of Umaru Abdullahi, a former President of the Appeal Court to look into the petitions and decide on the mater. There is no gain saying the fact that neither Onnoghen nor
1,454 total views, 2 views today